Monday, May 3, 2010

Road salt is poisoning water bodies, study finds.
By Martin Mittelstaedt – Environment Reporter


One of the most detailed investigations ever conducted in Canada into the fate of road salt has found that it is polluting groundwater and causing some streams during winter thaws to have salinity levels just under those found in the ocean.
The elevated salt readings were detected in Pickering where researchers from the University of Toronto have been studying how the salt spread on the highways, such as the 401, and other roadways through suburban sprawl affects water quality. They found that so much salty water from the community is ending up in Frenchman’s Bay, a scenic lagoon on the shores of Lake Ontario, that the small water body is being poisoned.
“Our Findings are pretty dramatic, and the effects are felt year- round,” said Nick Eyles, a geology- professor at the university and the lead researcher on the project. “We now know that 3,600 tones of road salt end up in that small lagoon every winter from direct run off in creeks and effectively poison it for the rest of the year.”
He called the findings, which were published recently in the journal Sedimentary Geology, “a really bad-news story” involving a “relentless chemical assault on watershed.”
The Pickering area provided researchers with an ideal place to study the effects of road-salt spreading, because most of the city lies within a relatively compact 27-square-kilometre watershed, where salt spread on roads ended up.
About 7,600 tones of salt is applied each year to roads in the community. About half of this amount seeps into groundwater, which in turn flows into streams year-round, making the water courses more salty than they should be, according to the research. The rest drains into Frenchman’s Bay, which is visible to commuters on the 401 and has a struggling fish population because salt levels are more than double the amounts typically found in the Great Lakes.
The salt water “knocks out fish,” Dr. Eyles said, adding vive, while younger ones move to areas of the lagoon closer to Lake Ontario and its fresher water.
The finding of major impacts on Pickering’s ground and surface water suggests a far greater toll from the use of salt elsewhere across Canada, where an estimated five million tones, or approximately 150 kilograms per Canadian, is used on roads each year to make them safe for travel in winter. The vast majority is applied in Ontario and Quebec.
“It’s a general problem… There are lots of other areas like this,” Dr. Eyles said, referring to the Pickering findings.
Environment Canada has recognized that salt has adverse impacts on wildlife, plants, water and soil, and in 2001 considered adding it to the country’s list of the most toxic substances. Instead, in 2004, the government instituted a voluntary code of practices to encourage municipalities and others to use the de-icer more sparingly, while maintaining highway safety. But with the vast amount used, huge quantities are still polluting soil and water, according to Dr. Eyles. “It’s a toxic material and yet we continue to throw it with gay abandon on our roads,” he said.
The University of Toronto’s research was based on water monitoring between May 2002, and March 2003, before the code went into effect.
It noted that after winter thaws, there were spikes in the amount of salt in streams, with those taking runoff from the 401 having approximately doubled the concentration of the pollutant than water-courses nearby that don’t take its storm water. Runoff from the highway, Canada’s busiest, also contains benzene, toluene, and xylene, hydrocarbons associated with contamination from underground gasoline storage tanks.
Environment Canada says it is currently reviewing whether the voluntary practices code has lead to any reduction in the amount of salt being spread on the roads. “If it is concluded, based on the review of progress, that other steps are needed for the management of road salts, Environment Canada will consider a range of possible options,” the department said in reaction to the study.



Taken from: The Globe and Mail, Friday March 5, 2010

Monday, April 19, 2010

UNCLEAN SWEEP

UNCLEAN SWEEP


Dr. Philip Tierno, director of clinical microbiology and immunology at New York University Medical Center and author of the “Secret Life of Germs,” says that 80 percent of all infectious diseases are spread through direct or indirect contact like kissing or touching doorknobs.

Here’s a list of the five filthiest spots in the city:

1. Touch screen ATM machines: “These machines are dirty because everyone touched the screen but nobody seems to wash them,” he says.
2. Public bathrooms: “People for some reason behave differently in these than in their own, and that’s what makes them disgusting,” he says.
3. Buses, trains and taxis: Tierno says that organisms, like fecal matter, linger in public transportation. Add a smoker, and the bacteria and germ levels skyrocket.
4. Escalators: Handrails, especially on hot and humid days, are germ covered. Plus, it’s easy to indirectly spread bacteria, particularly after you touch the handrail and touch your face.
Theaters and stadiums: Tierno says that any place in which people congregate is a breeding ground for bacteria.



Taken from the New York Post. Tuesday June 27, 2006. Pulse Health.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Study shows antibacterial wipes can spread germs.

Study shows antibacterial wipes can spread germs.

By Helen Branswell.

Antibacterial wipes used in hospitals may not be having the intended effect, a new study from Wales suggests.
The work, done by researchers from Cardiff University’s School of Pharmacy, shows that the wipes do not kill high numbers of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. So if they are used on more than one surface, rather than cleaning they may just be spreading germs around.
The researchers studied three types of wipes – one containing detergent, another containing disinfectants and a third containing a natural antimicrobial product.
“We found that all three wipes suffered from the same problem, in that they were transferred high numbers (of bacteria) and in fact in most cases uncountable numbers to consecutive surfaces,” said Gareth Williams, a microbiologist who presented the findings this week at an American Society for Microbiology conference in Boston.
Williams wouldn’t name the products and it’s unclear if they are used in Canadian hospitals.
Dr. Andrew Simor, head of microbiology at Toronto’s Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, said he wasn’t surprised by the findings.
“These disinfectants don’t kill all the bugs. You’re physically removing a layer of the organisms. But that doesn’t necessarily kill them. And so it’s easy to pick them up and transfer them to another area.”
Simor said in North America infection control recommendations would specify that a wipe should be used to clean a single area and then should be discarded.
Williams and his colleagues tested whether the three types of wipes could transfer methicillin-resistant Staph aureus – MRSA – or the antibiotic sensitive form of the bacteria from a surface inoculated with the bugs and whether the germs died if they were directly applied to the wipes.
All three types transferred MRSA, though in differing amounts. And none killed sufficient quantities of the bacteria to make reuse of a wipe safe.
Simor said that in his estimation these types of products aren’t needed in homes. “Our households are not settings where you’ve got the same risk of spread of infection (as in hospitals), he said.


Taken from the Hamilton Spectator. Thursday June 5, 2008

Monday, April 12, 2010

Private hospital rooms lower risk of C. difficile

Private hospital rooms lower risk of C. difficile.

BY ANDRE PICARD - PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTER
Article taken from the Globe and Mail - January 6, 2010

The more roommates you have during a hospital stay, the greater your risk of acquiring a dangerous infectious disease such as Clostridium difficile, according to new Canadian research.
The study, published in the American Journal of Infection Control, shows that each roommate a patient is exposed to hikes his or her risk of infection by 10 per cent.
“That is a significant risk,” Dick Zoutman, a professor of community health and epidemiology at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ont., said in an interview. He noted that, in Canada, most hospital rooms have either two or four beds and “there is a lot of turnover,” meaning that patients are routinely and unnecessarily exposed to a lot of infectious diseases.
Dr. Zoutman said that the research provides powerful evidence that single rooms are the safest, and should be the norm. “The take-home message is that our hospitals should be designed with private rooms for everyone,” he said.
While there would be an upfront cost, Dr. Zoutman noted that, over the long term, savings would be substantial: “This research provides the direct proof that should settle the discussion about the need for private rooms.”
Earlier research showed that about 225,000 patients a year suffer from hospital-acquired infections that substantially extend their stays, and between 8,000 and 12,000 people die annually as a result.

Shared washrooms may be the culprit

The new study was conducted at Kingston General Hospital, which was has 451 in-patient beds and about 17,000 patients a year. There are 107 single-occupancy rooms, 83 double-occupancy, six triple-occupancy, plus open bay areas and specialized units such as intensive care.
The study, which began as a master’s thesis by Queen’s student Meghan Hamel, examined patient records from 2001 to 2006. The research team looked for patients who suffered from three common but dangerous infections – C. difficile, methicillin-resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MSRA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) – and examined those patients’ exposure to other patients.
For each roommate to whom a patient was exposed, the risk of contracting C. difficile increased 11 per cent; for MSRA, 10 percent, for VRE, 15 per cent.
The median number of roommates was just over two, but some patients had as many as 46 roommates, whether due to a lengthy stay or to a heavy rotation of roommates.
Dr. Zoutman, who is also head of infection control at Kingston General, said that although the research was conducted at only one institution, “it is pretty typical of a Canadian hospital, and there is no reason to think this situation doesn’t exist everywhere.”
The infections that were studied- C. difficile, MSRA and VRE- are not airborne, but spread by contact.
Dr. Zoutman said the likely reason that roommates increase the risk of infection is that patients share a washroom. (The mantra in infection control is: One bum per toilet.) Another likely explanation involves inadequate hand washing by patients and health professionals alike; doctors sometimes don’t wash their hands between patient visits in a single room.
“The goal should be private rooms, or at the least, semi-private rooms,” Dr. Zoutman said. “But in the meantime, there are things we can do: We should be cleaning our hands, and we should really scrutinize how we clean our hospitals.”

A lack if roommates can help prevent routine and unnecessary exposure to infectious diseases.

Thursday, April 8, 2010

A great article about steam cleaning

MBCR INTRODUCES NEW SANITIZING STEAM CLEANING SYSTEM

To ensure the cleanest possible riding environment for its customers, Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company (MBCR) has announced the introduction of a new vapour sanitizing system to clean passenger coaches. This system is said to safely remove grease, grime and stains in a cost- effective manner without harming the environment.
"A sanitary, comfortable passenger coach is an essential part of a commuter's experience," said Richard A. Davey, general manager of MBCR. "The introduction of Advanced Vapour Technologies' proprietary steam vapour cleaning equipment into service will help us provide cleaner, fresher coaches for passengers during travel."
By using AVT's Mondo-Vap 2400 system, MBCR is able to utilize vapour cleaning technology, which eliminates bacteria, while using tap water. The cost effective system removes everything from old gum to stains that previously were impossible to remove. The system works on a wide range of materials, including vinyl, stainless steel and plastic type surfaces.
For more information, visit www.MBCR.net

Article taken from Sanitation Canada.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Message to our SteamKing 1500 Customers - Let me Know if you want to be on my email list elle@intersteam.com

Hi!

Are you ready to make 2009 a year of change??

There are so many uncertainties facing us that it can be hard to break out of our comfort zones to seek out and embrace positive change. The most common advice for this is to start with small steps that you can easily manage. In this case the comfort zone is your cleaning routines – and the positive change is using your Chemical Free SteamKing 1500 System for all kinds of daily cleaning tasks. If you embrace your SteamKing for positive change – I guarantee that you will have a cleaner work environment by 2010. That is the Cleaning Challenge.

We are pleased to have your business. You are receiving this email because we have supplied you with a SteamKing 1500 Vapour Cleaning System. Do you know where in your facility it is and what it is being used for?

If yes – that’s great news. Please consider some of the other uses for the system that I will share in my upcoming emails.

If not – let’s change that. If you need more information about your date of purchase or our contact within your organization, please let me know. You are looking for a red steam cleaner on a portable white metal cart. If you discover that it’s not in use because it isn’t working – did you know you can send it in to us (just pay shipping here – usually not more that $30) and we will give it a full evaluation for FREE? We will also call you, if repairs are needed, for your approval before we spend a dime of your money. Please click on the following link to find out more.

>> http://www.intersteam.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=page.display&page_id=19 <<

Over the next year you will continue to receive these emails with uses and procedures for making the most of your SteamKing 1500 System. If you are not the right person to be receiving this information please pass the message on, or let me know who I should be sending these messages to.

I encourage you to try these new uses, to make sure that your system is being used and to let me know if you need accessories, service repairs or more information.

Did you know that with the addition of a TANCS module installed in your SteamKing you can kill E.coli, MRSA, Bird Flu, Listeria, VRE and C.diff spores with a 5 second contact? If not – then I encourage you to read these emails to find out other amazing facts about your versatile, portable, efficient, safe and affordable SteamKing 1500.

If you would like more information about the TANCS technology – please check out this link.

>> http://www.intersteam.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=page.display&page_id=57 <<

There is no time like the present to take action to reduce labour cost and effort, reduce chemical usage for cost savings and the environment and enjoy the benefits of Chemical Free Steam Vapour Cleaning.

Let’s start at the bottom and work our way up – GROUT! Please check out this link.

>> http://www.intersteam.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=page.display&page_id=83 <<

to read more about your options for grout cleaning and how Steam can help you tackle this tough job.

Happy Cleaning! (With the SteamKing 1500 it’s possible!)

Thanks,

Elle Dietrich

Intersteam Technologies

1-800-281-4413

www.intersteam.com

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Disinfection, IAQ (Indoor Air Quality) Top Cleaning Concerns

CHICAGO – More than 68% of the customers of facility service providers (FSPs) are increasingly concerned about building contamination and disinfection issues.

A recent survey by Tornado Industries, maker of vacuum cleaners and other floorcare equipment, also found that nearly 80% of the end customers have become increasingly concerned about indoor air quality.

Further, the study found that more than 84% of FSPs “have taken steps to minimize the environmental impact of cleaning.”

Subscribers to the July issue of TornadoWatch, the monthly newsletter of Tornado, were invited to take part in the online survey.

Of the FSPs responding, 42% were building service contractors, nearly 45% in-housing cleaning professionals in schools and government facilities, with the remainder cleaning professionals in “other” industries. More than 100 people completed the survey, which has a confidence rating of 95%.

The study also reported that:
- The noise associated with cleaning was a concern of 53% of the respondents
- Moisture control when cleaning carpets and floors is an issue for 68% of the FSPs
- More than 78% of the respondents said they would select cleaning equipment that is more energy efficient as long as price and performance were the same; but just more than half list this as a key consideration when selecting cleaning equipment
- Although more than 60% indicated that there are recycling programs in place where they work, approximately the same number said it is not important to them if the cleaning equipment they select is made from or is recyclable.

“We actually see two significant trends in this survey,” says Jolynn Kennedy, marketing manager for Tornado. “First, end customers are getting much more concerned about the health of their facilities. Additionally, FSPs are becoming much more aware of the impact cleaning has on the environment and are taking steps to reduce it.”